Connect with us

Sports

In Roger Federer’s words: ‘I don’t try to copy anyone, that’s wrong’

Published

on

Reaching back-to-back Major quarter-finals at Roland Garros and Wimbledon in 2001, Roger Federer couldn’t keep the same level on the most significant scene in the next two years, falling in the early rounds and suffering a big blow at Wimbledon 2002 when Mario Ancic defeated him in straight sets in the first round.

Ready to bounce back, Federer won the title in Halle in June 2003 for the best preparation ahead of Wimbledon where he played on a high level, racing past the first three rivals and doing the same against Feliciano Lopez despite a nasty back injury during the training.

Returning to the quarter-finals at the All England Club, Federer toppled Sjeng Schalken in three sets to book the semi-final meeting against Andy Roddick, with both trying to advance into the first Major final. Determined to show his best tennis, Federer forged a 7-6, 6-3, 6-3 victory in an hour and 43 minutes, leaving Roddick far behind and staying on the title course in the cathedral of tennis.

Repelling two break chances at the beginning of the second set, Federer gave away only 17 points in 15 service games, mounting the pressure on the other side of the court and moving over the top with three breaks of serve on his tally.

Andy was there to fight in the opener, saving one break point and creating a set point at 6-5 in the tie break, only to spray a massive forehand error and ruin his chances for a more favorable result. With 74 winners and 35 errors, Federer was the ruler of the court, dominating in sets two and three to find himself in the first Major final at 21.

“My good serving made the difference, allowing me to play risky shots in his games. I had a chance to break him in the first set, going for shots and staying focused on the return games. My initial shot worked well and in those moments, I feel I can return any serve and keep the pressure on my opponents.

That was the crucial element in my win. I don’t try to copy anyone; I think that’s wrong. In the hitting zone, it is pretty much the same for all of us. The technique is the one that makes you look good or bad on the court. My favorite players were Boris Becker and Stefan Edberg and then Pete Sampras; I loved to watch them.”

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

Rafa Nadal and I have had our differences, but he’s an absolute champion,’ says Nick Kyrgios

Published

on

Nick Kyrgios admits that he and Rafa Nadal have ‘had their differences’ over the years but he can’t help but admire his achievements.

Nadal won his 20th Grand Slam crown at Roland Garros earlier this month to draw level with Roger Federer in the history books.

Kyrgios has a bit of a storied past when it comes to spats with Nadal, who he once branded ‘super salty’ whilst accusing him of being a bad loser.

Even he, though, can’t deny the Spaniard has achieved something special.

“I wasn’t surprised when I saw Rafa Nadal pretty much easing his way through the draw at the French Open,” Kyrgios told Courtside Huddle.

“That’s his backyard, he loves playing there and he has only lost two matches in his entire career.

“Honestly, in my opinion I don’t think we are going to see anything like that ever again.

“Somebody so dominant on a surface he’s right there with the greatest of all time. You can argue that he is the greatest.’

“You look at Federer, he’s the most dominant player of all time, but in this era it’s actually Rafa. It’s a debate you can have.”

“We had our differences when we played each other. We’re fiery, we’re competitors and are going to go after each other.

“But at the same time I am not going to take anything away from him . He’s an absolute champion and 20 Grand Slam is ridiculous and I don’t think we are ever going to see that again.”

Continue Reading

Trending